Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hynix

HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB

▲ 502 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2016.

Average Bench: 69.6% (98th of 132)

Based on 71,691 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
Poor: 47%Average: 69.6% Great: 79%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB averaged 30.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 26.4GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB is 31.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.4GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 89ns

Average Bench

(Based on 71,691 samples)
Rank 9869.6%
Min Avg Max
16.8 MC Read 26.4 30
16.9 MC Write 27.2 31
17.7 MC Mixed 21.4 23.4
71.5% 25 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.07 SC Read 14.4 18.2
12.9 SC Write 25.7 32.6
8.97 SC Mixed 20.2 24.9
57.4% 20.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.6 Latency 89 137
44.9% 89 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
71.2% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 20.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 21.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
68.6% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 21.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
64.4% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 19.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 18.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 19.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
61.6% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 17.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
59% Above average
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
53% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
50% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 19
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
71,691 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,336,462 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB Builds (Compare 4,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9560 - $1,300

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples3,836x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples311x
Core i3-7100HIntelBench 56%, 141 samples13x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples2,682x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,447x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples6x
SSD
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples497x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba  $35Bench 145%, 33,719 samples495x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples296x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples1,214x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,300

Popular HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
BurntTech
Avatar level
42

Average

5 years ago.

Should be better then it is

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback