Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	394% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

10 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	117.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230223
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '23 at 02:42
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Memory 72.1 1-Core 143 2-Core 284 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 1,106 98% 831 Pts	64-Core 2,842 176% 2,842 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8591) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.6% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 128 Parallax 118 93% 120 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 121 Splatting 108 92% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 2,905 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2843 2369 2474 2401 2101 2110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	394% Outstanding	Read 3,213 Write 4,747 Mixed 1,922 SusWrite 2,383 691% 3,066 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 71.5 247% 87.6 MB/s	DQ Read 988 DQ Write 968 DQ Mixed 930 712% 962 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 394% Great: 448%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 619GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 98 131 164 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 120 Write 107 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 114 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 108%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 129GB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 188 185 187 197 171 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Read 102 Write 173 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 184 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 2 570% 4 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 115%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB 2,620 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 253GB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 161 159 171 157 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 166 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 161 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.4 215% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 113%
Toshiba MC04ACA4 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 448GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 1.6 2.1 2 0.5 4.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48% Average	Read 162 Write 32.3 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 2.3 42% 57 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.3 469% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 88%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 226GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 161 159 167 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 159 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	MC Read 35.7 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 31.7 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.4 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 32.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 151%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $129Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	834x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	516x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	405x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16