Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJan 19 '18 at 06:16
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 144
60% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 434
42% 348 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 76.5
54% 67.5 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 75.8
53% 63.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 497
Write 317
Mixed 329
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 8.58
66% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 42.1
39% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
289GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 123
Write 120
Mixed 121
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.23
74% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 113%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1866C9-8GXM F3-10666CL9-4GBXL F3-1866C9-8GXM F3-10666CL9-4GBXL 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback