Biostar TA770XE3

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar TA770XE3 (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110225
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '18 at 10:55
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945 12,746 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 79.3 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 86.9 46% 70 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 157 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 30.9 Parallax 38.2 37% 38.3 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 36.6 31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 163 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 46 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 710056468	50.3% Above average	Read 229 Write 213 Mixed 199 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 21.4 85% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 67.3 DQ Mixed 22.2 25% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 124%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 662GB free Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 148675486 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4375 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 4905605848 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 26871 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4263 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 122 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 317 (BE) vendor-specific 70 40 408526848030 (C2) HDA temperature 30 60 51539607582 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 35 148675486 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 92852898010867 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4292507091 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3707535474	44.6% Average	Read 83.5 Write 72 Mixed 24.4 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.52 105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.6 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TA770XE3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA770XE3

CPU
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	1x
850 120GBSamsungBench 95%, 3,514 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5773QB0-CK0 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 33%, 2 samples	1x
99U5471-001.A00LF 4x2GBKingstonBench 42%, 215 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GBSamsungBench 39%, 485 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $164

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16