TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Adata

Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2020.

Average Bench: 82.7% (62nd of 132)

Based on 22 user benchmarks.  Model: Adata Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
Poor: 34%Average: 82.7% Great: 98%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

The Adata Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB averaged just 17.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Adata Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 32.6GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 30.9GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Adata Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB is 63.5%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Adata Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 86.2ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.4GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 22 samples)
Rank 6282.7%
Min Avg Max
13.6 MC Read 32.6 42.3
8 MC Write 30.8 41.2
8.1 MC Mixed 25.8 36.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
4.3 SC Read 18.4 25.4
5.3 SC Write 30.9 47.3
6.2 SC Mixed 24 30.1
69.8% 24.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59 Latency 86.2 342
46.4% 86.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 35.2
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 30.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 31.8
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 28.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
3533, 3533 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 37.4
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 27.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 29.8
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
75.2% Very good
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 27.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 27.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
22 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,413,036 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB Builds (Compare 12,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples1,478x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD  $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples1,324x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD  $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples1,015x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples965x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples747x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples661x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples724x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples346x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples286x
RAM
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GBAdataBench 83%, 22 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $287

Popular Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback