Average Bench: 93.1% (15th of 115)

Based on 1,793 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB

Excellent average bench

The Crucial BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB averaged just 6.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 36.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 33.3GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB is 42.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 71.9ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 22.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,793 samples)
Min Avg Max
28.4 MC Read 36.9 44.3
20 MC Write 33 42
20.9 MC Mixed 30.5 38.5
95.6% 33.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.1 SC Read 22.3 29.2
19.7 SC Write 33.3 44.2
20.4 SC Mixed 28.3 35.7
79.9% 28 GB/s
Min Avg Max
54.7 Latency 71.9 92.9
55.6% 71.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 28.2
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 28.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 48.9
82% 48.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 42
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 37.3
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 27.2
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 28.2
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 28.4
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 26.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 30
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 35.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 24.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 24.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.1
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 22.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 20.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
1,793 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,044,999 RAM Kits tested

Typical BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB Builds (Compare 19,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,119

Popular BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback