Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 99.1% (24th of 132)

Based on 613 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3200C14-16GVR 2x16GB

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB averaged just 0.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 39.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 33.9GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB is 57.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 65.9ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 24.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 613 samples)
Min Avg Max
25.9 MC Read 39.1 52.2
23.5 MC Write 33.9 44.8
22.1 MC Mixed 33.8 47.5
102% 35.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.9 SC Read 24.1 32.7
17.9 SC Write 32.6 46.1
21.1 SC Mixed 32.4 45.1
84.8% 29.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
48.2 Latency 65.9 94.2
60.7% 65.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 127
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 45.4
203% 71.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 39.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 43.6
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 32.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 28.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 28
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 33.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 31.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 14.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
613 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,322,838 RAM Kits tested

Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB Builds (Compare 5,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,308

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback