Average Bench: 75.3% (71st of 115)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown AQD-D4U16N24-SE 2x16GB
Poor: 71%Average: 75.3% Great: 80%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Unknown AQD-D4U16N24-SE 2x16GB averaged 24.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown AQD-D4U16N24-SE 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 29.1GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 28.3GB/s

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown AQD-D4U16N24-SE 2x16GB is just 9.06%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Unknown AQD-D4U16N24-SE 2x16GB performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.8GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 73.3ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Min Avg Max
26.2 MC Read 27.9 30.4
27.4 MC Write 29.1 32.2
22.3 MC Mixed 23.8 25.3
76.9% 26.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
11.8 SC Read 15.8 18.7
24 SC Write 28.3 32.5
16.3 SC Mixed 22 25.2
62.9% 22 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.9 Latency 73.3 88.5
54.5% 73.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 25.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 25.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 25.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 22.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,355,280 RAM Kits tested

Typical AQD-D4U16N24-SE 2x16GB Builds (Compare 14,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87

Popular AQD-D4U16N24-SE 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback