Average Bench: 55% (91st of 115)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GB
Poor: 37%Average: 55% Great: 65%

Average average bench

The Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GB averaged 44.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 21.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 20.4GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GB is 28.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11.6GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 14.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.6 MC Read 21.6 27.9
11.1 MC Write 20.4 30.7
11.2 MC Mixed 17.9 22
57% 19.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.1 SC Read 11.6 14.3
11.6 SC Write 16.4 22.6
11.1 SC Mixed 14.5 19.1
40.5% 14.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
71.8 Latency 93.2 133
42.9% 93.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 22
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 18.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 11.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
2 of 24 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 25
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
2 of 8 slots used
63GB RIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,364,292 RAM Kits tested

Typical 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Gaming TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $203

Popular 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6J1 2x31.5GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback