TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Corsair

CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2020.

Average Bench: 73% (92nd of 132)

Based on 20 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GB
Poor: 41%Average: 73% Great: 102%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GB averaged 27.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 27.2GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 27.1GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GB is 61.1%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 84.3ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 20 samples)
Rank 9273%
Min Avg Max
13.4 MC Read 27.2 41.3
13.6 MC Write 27 37.1
11.6 MC Mixed 23.6 37.2
74.1% 25.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.8 SC Read 18.3 27.7
14.3 SC Write 27.1 41.7
9.1 SC Mixed 22.8 35.3
64.9% 22.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.4 Latency 84.3 111
47.4% 84.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 27.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 26.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2000 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 26.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 27.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
71% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
70.8% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 22
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
20 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,480,531 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel  $110Bench 94%, 46,609 samples100x
Core i5-11400Intel  $114Bench 94%, 24,459 samples69x
Core i5-11600KIntel  $178Bench 99%, 43,966 samples69x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples86x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples78x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples46x
SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples29x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $110Bench 385%, 327,441 samples27x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $72Bench 224%, 92,081 samples17x
RAM
CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GBCorsairBench 73%, 20 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $470

Popular CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 2x31.5GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback