TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hynix

HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2020.

Average Bench: 45.8% (119th of 132)

Based on 1,668 user benchmarks.  Model: Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB
Poor: 38%Average: 45.8% Great: 51%

Popular builds with this RAM

Below average average bench

The Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB averaged 54.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 17.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 16.7GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB is just 13.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 13.6GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 103ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,668 samples)
Rank 11945.8%
Min Avg Max
14.3 MC Read 16.7 18.7
12.5 MC Write 16.7 20.1
10.8 MC Mixed 13.6 16.7
44.6% 15.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.8 SC Read 14.9 20.8
11.5 SC Write 17.7 21.9
10 SC Mixed 14.5 20.2
44.9% 15.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
76 Latency 103 152
38.9% 103 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 11.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
32.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
31.6% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
27.4% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 3.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 432
9% 432 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
23.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 7.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
1,668 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,413,500 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB Builds (Compare 2,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples2,688x
Core i5-11300HIntelBench 71%, 8,880 samples22x
GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples1,363x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples1,344x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1x
SSD
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples640x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples541x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples355x
RAM
HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 46%, 1,668 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback