Average Bench: 79.5% (76th of 131)

Based on 1,277 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB averaged 20.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 31.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 31GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB is 22.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.6GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 66.1ns

Average Bench

(Based on 1,277 samples)
Min Avg Max
24.8 MC Read 31 33.6
23.1 MC Write 30.6 34.3
19.9 MC Mixed 22.9 24.2
80.4% 28.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.91 SC Read 16.6 19.3
18.6 SC Write 31.9 39.6
15.2 SC Mixed 23.8 28.2
68.8% 24.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
56.8 Latency 66.1 87.1
60.5% 66.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 21.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 19.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 21.9
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
1,277 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,376,289 RAM Kits tested

Typical NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB Builds (Compare 2,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 76%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328


Popular NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


131 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback