Average Bench: 45% (102nd of 115)

Based on 941 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB

Below average average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB averaged 55.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 17.3GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 16.1GB/s

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB is just 19.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 12.5GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.2GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 941 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.2 MC Read 17.3 20.1
11.3 MC Write 16 20.3
10 MC Mixed 12.5 15.3
43.6% 15.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.06 SC Read 13.2 17.6
8.1 SC Write 16.1 21.4
7.82 SC Mixed 13.5 16.3
40.7% 14.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
58.8 Latency 86.9 140
46% 86.9 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 14.7
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 12.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
941 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,986,508 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB Builds (Compare 3,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $45

Popular CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback