TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Transcend

JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2020.

Average Bench: 83.9% (59th of 132)

Based on 330 user benchmarks.  Model: Transcend JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB
Poor: 63%Average: 83.9% Great: 104%

Popular builds with this RAM

Very good average bench

The Transcend JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB averaged just 16.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Transcend JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 33.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 32.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Transcend JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB is 41.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Transcend JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 91.3ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 330 samples)
Rank 5983.9%
Min Avg Max
24.3 MC Read 32.6 41.9
22.6 MC Write 31.6 40.8
19.1 MC Mixed 27 35.3
86.9% 30.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10 SC Read 18.5 26.4
21 SC Write 33.5 43
13.3 SC Mixed 22.6 30.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
62.3 Latency 91.3 140
43.8% 91.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 33
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
84% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 24.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
83% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 28.8
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 16.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
79.3% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 22.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 28.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
64.3% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
60.3% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
53.3% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
330 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,435,633 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB Builds (Compare 1,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 82N6

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800HAMDBench 75%, 19,785 samples799x
Ryzen 9 5900HXAMDBench 78%, 12,809 samples468x
GPU
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples675x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples344x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples153x
SSD
SKHynix_HFS001TDE9X084N 1TBBench 300%, 7,772 samples526x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2 1TBSamsungBench 281%, 13,997 samples391x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1101 1TBWDCBench 252%, 7,885 samples63x
RAM
JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GBTranscendBench 84%, 330 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular JM3200HSE-16G 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback