TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Kingston

99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2020.

Average Bench: 70.1% (97th of 131)

Based on 288 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB
Poor: 35%Average: 70.1% Great: 85%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB averaged 29.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 26.8GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB is 49.4%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 106ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 288 samples)
Rank 9770.1%
Min Avg Max
13.2 MC Read 26.8 33.3
14.6 MC Write 27.2 33.7
13.3 MC Mixed 22.1 28.8
72.5% 25.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.43 SC Read 14.7 20.6
8.22 SC Write 25.8 35.6
8.24 SC Mixed 19.7 26.2
57.4% 20.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
62.5 Latency 106 218
37.8% 106 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
79.1% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
71.1% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
68.3% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 22.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
68.1% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.2
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
61.5% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 19.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.2
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
288 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,380,893 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC11PABi7

CPU
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples440x
GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples402x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples7x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples4x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 385%, 327,441 samples39x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $90Bench 338%, 78,573 samples18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples18x
RAM
99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 288 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $105

Popular 99U5700-027.A00G 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

131 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback