Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2020.

Average Bench: 102% (23rd of 132)

Based on 53 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB
Poor: 78%Average: 102% Great: 166%

Popular builds with this RAM

Outstanding average bench

The Crucial CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB averaged 2.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 41.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 36.9GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB is 88%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 77.1ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 20.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 53 samples)
Rank 23102%
Min Avg Max
25.8 MC Read 41.9 87.9
20.1 MC Write 36.9 72.8
23.2 MC Mixed 34.9 72.2
108% 37.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.6 SC Read 20.9 30.8
18.2 SC Write 31.1 45.9
15.7 SC Mixed 29.9 40.8
77.9% 27.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.3 Latency 77.1 97.3
51.9% 77.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 30.2
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 27.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.2
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 38.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 28.1
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 28
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
88% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 23.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 25.7
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 27.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
78.5% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 24.2
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
78.5% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.3
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 26.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
53 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,336,873 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB Builds (Compare 11,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $175

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $160Bench 88%, 746,287 samples6,309x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $123Bench 91%, 264,837 samples2,247x
Core i7-8700Intel  $140Bench 87%, 349,567 samples1,011x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples1,166x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples1,132x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples781x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples559x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples518x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $116Bench 310%, 455,997 samples430x
RAM
CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GBCrucialBench 102%, 53 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $652

Popular CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 4 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback