Average Bench: 81% (70th of 131)

Based on 46 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown - [0xCD04] F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB

Very good average bench

The Unknown - [0xCD04] F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB averaged just 18.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown - [0xCD04] F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 31.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 31GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown - [0xCD04] F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB is 38.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown - [0xCD04] F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 105ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 16.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 46 samples)
Min Avg Max
12.5 MC Read 31.3 43
14.1 MC Write 31 42
12.5 MC Mixed 27.2 39.3
85.2% 29.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.2 SC Read 16.5 23.4
12 SC Write 30.6 45.3
9.6 SC Mixed 21.3 29
65.1% 22.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.5 Latency 105 217
38.2% 105 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 38.5
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 26.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 38.2
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 23.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 37.8
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 25.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 34.2
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 24.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 30.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
46 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,376,182 RAM Kits tested

Typical - [0xCD04] F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 15.6 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular - [0xCD04] F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

131 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback