Average Bench: 83.7% (59th of 132)

Based on 443 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB

Very good average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB averaged just 16.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 33.8GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 33GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB is 32%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 76.5ns

Average Bench

(Based on 443 samples)
Min Avg Max
26.2 MC Read 33 41.1
23.2 MC Write 31.8 38.8
20.5 MC Mixed 25.4 31.3
85.9% 30.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.7 SC Read 17.9 27
18.7 SC Write 33.8 43.5
14 SC Mixed 22.9 31.3
71.1% 24.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
58.9 Latency 76.5 109
52.3% 76.5 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 30.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 17.5
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 28.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 17.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 19.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.7
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 8.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
443 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,524,598 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15G XC


Popular CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback