Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung

M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2021.

Average Bench: 64% (104th of 132)

Based on 34 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GB
Poor: 46%Average: 64% Great: 83%

Popular builds with this RAM

Above average average bench

The Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GB averaged 36.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 25.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 24.2GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GB is 36.9%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 97ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.1GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 34 samples)
Rank 10464%
Min Avg Max
15.9 MC Read 23.9 32.7
14.9 MC Write 24.2 35
13.6 MC Mixed 19.6 27
64.5% 22.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.8 SC Read 18.1 26.1
12.3 SC Write 25.7 40.4
8.7 SC Mixed 18.8 28.2
59.6% 20.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
77 Latency 97 172
41.2% 97 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
73.5% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 11.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
72% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 21
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 17.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
64.6% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 15.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
46.3% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 13.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
34 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,303,271 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GB Builds (Compare 2,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401QM_GA401QM

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900HSAMDBench 76%, 6,069 samples2,449x
Ryzen 7 5800HSAMDBench 73%, 2,861 samples248x
GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 157,783 samples1,600x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,097x
SSD
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBBench 253%, 21,294 samples1,141x
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 7,795 samples873x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $70Bench 251%, 14,932 samples317x
RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GBSamsungBench 64%, 34 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M471A1G44AB0-CWE Kingston 9905744-066.A00G 39GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback