Unknown

H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB

H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB
BENCHMARKS (2,127)
MKT (0%)
BUILDS
(0)

Effective Speed -20%Effective Speed -20%Average Score -21%MC Read -17%, MC Write -30%, MC Mixed -15%Peak Score -43%MC Read -38%, MC Write -55%, MC Mixed -35%Value & Sentiment -1,045%User Rating -12%, Market Share -2,078%Nice To Haves -1%SC Read -14%, SC Write 9%, SC Mixed -12%, SC Read -21%, SC Write 12%, SC Mixed -16%, Latency -70%, Latency -77%, Age 182%

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB

Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB

Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB

Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB

Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

Average Bench: 74.8% (71^st of 115)

Based on 2,127 user benchmarks. Model: Unknown H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB

Poor: 60%Average: 74.8% Great: 86%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Unknown H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB averaged 25.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 30.5GB/s

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 29.8GB/s

See where your RAM ranks →

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB is 25.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Unknown H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 125ns

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 2,127 samples)

Rank 7174.8%

Min	Avg	Max
24.2	MC Read 29.8	34.1
19.6	MC Write 25.5	29.3
21.8	MC Mixed 26.2	30
77.6% 27.2 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
12	SC Read 17	22.3
19.4	SC Write 30.5	44.7
16.2	SC Mixed 22.5	28.8
66.8% 23.4 GB/s

Min	Avg	Max
97.3	Latency 125	168
32% 125 ns

User Benchmarks

Bench

Multi core

Single core

Latency

The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%

FRA-User, 3 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz

84.9% Excellent

MC Read 31.7

MC Write 29

MC Mixed 28.2

85% 29.6 GB/s

SC Read 22.2

SC Write 44.7

SC Mixed 28.2

91% 31.7 GB/s

Latency 100

40% 100 ns

BEL-User, 4 hrs ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz

84.9% Excellent

MC Read 32.2

MC Write 29.2

MC Mixed 27.8

85% 29.7 GB/s

SC Read 21.2

SC Write 43.9

SC Mixed 28

89% 31 GB/s

Latency 98.2

41% 98.2 ns

ROU-User, 2 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz

81.5% Excellent

MC Read 30.7

MC Write 27.1

MC Mixed 27.6

81% 28.5 GB/s

SC Read 22.1

SC Write 40.9

SC Mixed 27.2

86% 30.1 GB/s

Latency 101

40% 101 ns

USA-User, 1 day ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz

79.6% Very good

MC Read 30.2

MC Write 27.6

MC Mixed 26.9

81% 28.2 GB/s

SC Read 20.6

SC Write 36.5

SC Mixed 27.1

80% 28.1 GB/s

Latency 115

35% 115 ns

TWN-User, 11 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz

77.5% Very good

MC Read 31.3

MC Write 26.5

MC Mixed 28.3

82% 28.7 GB/s

SC Read 16.2

SC Write 27.9

SC Mixed 21.1

62% 21.7 GB/s

Latency 121

33% 121 ns

USA-User, 11 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz

72.6% Very good

MC Read 29.1

MC Write 24.2

MC Mixed 24.9

74% 26.1 GB/s

SC Read 19.4

SC Write 30

SC Mixed 23.6

70% 24.3 GB/s

Latency 133

30% 133 ns

NLD-User, 3 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz

69.6% Good

MC Read 27.6

MC Write 24.4

MC Mixed 24.8

73% 25.6 GB/s

SC Read 14.3

SC Write 26.8

SC Mixed 19.2

58% 20.1 GB/s

Latency 130

31% 130 ns

ROU-User, 6 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 4266 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz

62.5% Good

MC Read 24.7

MC Write 22

MC Mixed 22.1

66% 22.9 GB/s

SC Read 13.2

SC Write 23.8

SC Mixed 18.5

53% 18.5 GB/s

Latency 146

27% 146 ns

IDN-User, 2 days ago.

2 of 2 slots used

16GB LPDDR4 4266 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz

26.7% Poor

MC Read 11.1

MC Write 11.7

MC Mixed 9.2

30% 10.7 GB/s

SC Read 3

SC Write 5.1

SC Mixed 4.8

12% 4.3 GB/s

Latency 454

9% 454 ns

2,127 MORE »

Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,050,925 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB Builds (Compare 1,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Microsoft Surface Laptop 4

CPU
Core i7-1185G7IntelBench 67%, 9,588 samples	998x
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples	294x
Ryzen 5 Microsoft Surface EditionAMDBench 63%, 613 samples	287x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	1,480x
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	432x

SSD
SDBPTPZ-512G-1124-WDC 512GBBench 154%, 368 samples	559x
HFM256GDGTNI-82A0A 256GBBench 104%, 496 samples	256x
MZ9LQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 115%, 1,535 samples	197x

RAM
H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 2,127 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. ^[RAMPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?

Why buy USB 3.0 today?

USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

Memory Kits

What is the RAM value for money rating?

What is the effective RAM speed index?

What is the system memory latency ladder?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Unknown

H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB

Average Bench: 74.8% (71^st of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Microsoft Surface Laptop 4

Popular H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Unknown

H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB

Average Bench: 74.8% (71st of 115)

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

Strengths

Good consistency

Weaknesses

Average Bench

Market Share (See Leaders)

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

System: Microsoft Surface Laptop 4

Popular H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 2x8GB systems:

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Group Test Results

Share a related link

Comments

Speed Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback

Average Bench: 74.8% (71^st of 115)