Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 98.9% (24th of 132)

Based on 614 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB

Excellent average bench

The Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB averaged just 1.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 43.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 34.1GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB is 68.8%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.6ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 24.8GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 614 samples)
Min Avg Max
26.6 MC Read 43.2 71.4
17.9 MC Write 31.3 44.2
22.3 MC Mixed 34.1 45.8
103% 36.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
14.3 SC Read 24.8 32
17.3 SC Write 26.7 45.9
20.5 SC Mixed 32.4 42.6
80% 28 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.3 Latency 78.6 101
50.9% 78.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 73.9
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 43
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 39.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3866 MHz
MC Read 58.8
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 45.3
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 42.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 38.1
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.7
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 32.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 31.9
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 25.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 28.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 20.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
614 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,290,066 RAM Kits tested

Typical TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 3,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $638

Popular TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback