Average Bench: 51.8% (93rd of 115)

Based on 1,267 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB

Average average bench

The Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB averaged 48.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 18.9GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 18.5GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB is 24.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 90.8ns
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 16.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,267 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.1 MC Read 18.9 22.3
12.9 MC Write 18.1 21.2
10.9 MC Mixed 16.3 19.9
50.7% 17.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
7.62 SC Read 16.3 21.9
10.7 SC Write 18.5 22.9
8.52 SC Mixed 17.3 21.9
49.6% 17.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
65 Latency 90.8 142
44.1% 90.8 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 15.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 18.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 18
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 21.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 12.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
1,267 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 66,986,391 RAM Kits tested

Typical M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB Builds (Compare 4,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $458

Popular M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback