Average Bench: 95.7% (12th of 115)

Based on 6,792 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB

Excellent average bench

The Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB averaged just 4.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 37.5GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 36.2GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB is 37.5%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 81.2ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.8GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,792 samples)
Min Avg Max
28.3 MC Read 37.5 43
23.9 MC Write 34.2 41.3
22.9 MC Mixed 32.8 37.8
99.6% 34.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
14.6 SC Read 21.8 27
22.4 SC Write 36.2 43.8
19.1 SC Mixed 26.9 32.3
80.8% 28.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.9 Latency 81.2 99.8
49.3% 81.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 37.9
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 29.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 37.5
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 28.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 36.2
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 34.6
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 31.4
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 26
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 36
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.1
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 33.2
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 30.1
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 30.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 29.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 28.8
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
6,792 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,004,733 RAM Kits tested

Typical M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB Builds (Compare 2,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

System: HP Victus by HP 15L Gaming Desktop TG02-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $474

Popular M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback