Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 90.5% (38th of 132)

Based on 240 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-3466C16-8GVR 2x8GB

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB averaged just 9.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 35.4GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 32.8GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB is 56.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 67.3ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.9GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 240 samples)
Min Avg Max
19.7 MC Read 35.4 47
17.9 MC Write 32.8 44.7
16.1 MC Mixed 28.5 37.3
92.1% 32.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
13.9 SC Read 21.9 28.1
16.6 SC Write 32.7 47.5
16.7 SC Mixed 28.1 37.1
78.8% 27.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
46.4 Latency 67.3 104
59.4% 67.3 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 42
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 30.8
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 47.8
SC Mixed 32.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 45.5
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 35.1
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 35.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 31
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 33.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 33
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 26.9
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 25.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 29.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 25.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
240 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,061,126 RAM Kits tested

Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB Builds (Compare 4,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $582

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback