Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 99.8% (23rd of 132)

Based on 582 user benchmarks.  Model: G.SKILL F4-4400C19-16GVK 2x16GB

Excellent average bench

The G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB averaged just 0.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 42GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Mixed IO Bench 34.2GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB is 63.1%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 68.6ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 25.2GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 582 samples)
Min Avg Max
24.4 MC Read 42 70
19.9 MC Write 33.1 50.1
19.5 MC Mixed 32.7 42.2
103% 35.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.5 SC Read 25.2 31.5
19.4 SC Write 30.7 52.2
21.4 SC Mixed 34.2 44.1
85.7% 30 GB/s
Min Avg Max
46.9 Latency 68.6 91
58.3% 68.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 54.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 43.2
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 33.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 43
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 38.7
103% 38.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 30.5
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 29.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4066 MHz
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 31.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 41.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 33
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 35.5
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 21.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 28.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 29.5
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
582 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,335,713 RAM Kits tested

Typical Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB Builds (Compare 17,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - $164

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $956

Popular Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback