Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 58.6% (106th of 132)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Apacer 78.C1GET.AF10C Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 16GB
Poor: 53%Average: 58.6% Great: 61%

Popular builds with this RAM

Average average bench

The Apacer 78.C1GET.AF10C Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 16GB averaged 41.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 21.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 21GB/s

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Apacer 78.C1GET.AF10C Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 16GB is just 7.51%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Apacer 78.C1GET.AF10C Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 16GB performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.9GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 80.2ns

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Min Avg Max
18.4 MC Read 21 21.8
20.9 MC Write 21.9 22.4
18.1 MC Mixed 18.9 19.4
58.8% 20.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
10.9 SC Read 13.9 15.5
16.1 SC Write 20.7 22.4
16.3 SC Mixed 19 20.4
51.1% 17.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
73.3 Latency 80.2 90.1
49.9% 80.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 20.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,289,884 RAM Kits tested

Typical 78.C1GET.AF10C Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 16GB Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B150-PLUS D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287

Popular 78.C1GET.AF10C Kingston 99P5471-033.A00LF 16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback