TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Unknown

CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2021.

Average Bench: 79.7% (59th of 115)

Based on 47 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
Poor: 56%Average: 79.7% Great: 101%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Unknown CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB averaged 20.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 31.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 31.4GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB is 44.2%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 69.2ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 47 samples)
Rank 5979.7%
Min Avg Max
10.5 MC Read 28.7 38.4
11.7 MC Write 31.4 41.4
11.7 MC Mixed 24.7 32.9
80.8% 28.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.5 SC Read 17 22.8
11.4 SC Write 31.7 46
7.9 SC Mixed 23.5 32
68.8% 24.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
53.4 Latency 69.2 184
57.8% 69.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 29.9
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 17.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 29.1
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
94% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 28.7
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 28.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
74.5% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
71.9% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
2600, 2600, 2600, 2600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
68.7% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
65.4% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 20.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 21.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
47 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,338,388 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $190Bench 88%, 746,287 samples635x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples315x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples225x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples149x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples144x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples121x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples63x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples51x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples44x
RAM
CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GBUnknownBench 80%, 47 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $484

Popular CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback