Average Bench: 79% (60th of 115)

Based on 88 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown TIMETEC-SD4-3200 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Unknown TIMETEC-SD4-3200 2x8GB averaged 21.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown TIMETEC-SD4-3200 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 31.4GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 30.5GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown TIMETEC-SD4-3200 2x8GB is 46.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown TIMETEC-SD4-3200 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 103ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.2GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 88 samples)
Min Avg Max
18.7 MC Read 30.5 40.4
17.2 MC Write 29.9 39.1
15.8 MC Mixed 25.7 33.8
81.9% 28.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.04 SC Read 17.2 26.2
13.3 SC Write 31.4 42.4
12.8 SC Mixed 21.2 30.7
66.6% 23.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.6 Latency 103 178
38.9% 103 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 34.5
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 29.7
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 17.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 33.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 23.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 5.8
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.9
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 632
6% 632 ns
88 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,289,793 RAM Kits tested

Typical TIMETEC-SD4-3200 2x8GB Builds (Compare 15,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular TIMETEC-SD4-3200 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback