Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2021.

Average Bench: 99.5% (23rd of 132)

Based on 467 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB
Poor: 76%Average: 99.5% Great: 120%

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

The Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB averaged just 0.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 39.5GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 34.4GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB is 44.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 70.7ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 25GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 467 samples)
Rank 2399.5%
Min Avg Max
28.8 MC Read 39.5 54.3
20 MC Write 34.3 42.9
24.5 MC Mixed 33.6 42.1
102% 35.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
17.1 SC Read 25 31.6
19.8 SC Write 34.4 45.8
21.4 SC Mixed 31.8 40.2
86.9% 30.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
55.2 Latency 70.7 89.5
56.6% 70.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
154% Outstanding
MC Read 113
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 36.4
174% 61 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 32.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
138% Outstanding
MC Read 93
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 36.2
155% 54.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 32.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
114% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 39.2
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 31.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 37.2
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 33.6
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 38.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 27.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 36.1
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 31.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 29.9
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 44.8
SC Mixed 30.6
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.6
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 38
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 30.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 28
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
467 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,047,598 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB Builds (Compare 20,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4 - $139

CPU
Core i5-12600KIntel  $155Bench 109%, 101,563 samples6,074x
Core i7-12700KIntel  $189Bench 114%, 78,749 samples4,930x
Core i7-12700KFIntel  $212Bench 114%, 70,812 samples1,972x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $751Bench 187%, 424,051 samples2,157x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $470Bench 148%, 619,642 samples2,048x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia  $430Bench 158%, 218,061 samples1,737x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $98Bench 385%, 327,441 samples1,585x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,339x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $75Bench 251%, 262,559 samples1,196x
RAM
BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GBCrucialBench 100%, 467 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,144

Popular BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback