Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q3 2016.

Average Bench: 76.7% (80th of 132)

Based on 1,900 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB
Poor: 44%Average: 76.7% Great: 88%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB averaged 23.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 29.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 28.7GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB is 44%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 18.1GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 77.4ns

Average Bench

(Based on 1,900 samples)
Rank 8076.7%
Min Avg Max
15.4 MC Read 28.7 33.4
15 MC Write 28.3 33
13.5 MC Mixed 24.9 30.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
12.1 SC Read 18.1 25.2
16.3 SC Write 29.2 34.8
14.6 SC Mixed 23.7 29.8
67.6% 23.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
62.9 Latency 77.4 100
51.7% 77.4 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 35.1
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 36.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 27.4
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 26.1
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 26.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2263 MHz
78.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.4
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
1,900 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,301,589 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB Builds (Compare 12,595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $189

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel  $240Bench 97%, 550,833 samples3,151x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $130Bench 93%, 321,194 samples2,900x
Core i9-9900KIntel  $385Bench 98%, 354,223 samples1,734x
GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $387Bench 115%, 663,603 samples983x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples916x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples830x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 275%, 495,311 samples479x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $116Bench 310%, 455,997 samples468x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples363x
RAM
BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GBCrucialBench 77%, 1,900 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $896

Popular BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback