Average Bench: 86.6% (29th of 115)

Based on 608 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB

Very good average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB averaged just 13.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 33.5GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 33.1GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB is 46.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 104ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17.3GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 608 samples)
Min Avg Max
20.5 MC Read 32.8 40.1
24.4 MC Write 33.5 39.8
20.6 MC Mixed 29.6 36.5
91.3% 31.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.68 SC Read 17.3 26.8
16.5 SC Write 33.1 44.2
10.8 SC Mixed 21.9 31.4
68.8% 24.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
70 Latency 104 164
38.5% 104 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 37.5
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 27.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35.8
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 24.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 32.2
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 22.2
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 35.8
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 26.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 32.3
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 19.7
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 17
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
608 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,089,867 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB Builds (Compare 4,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 15 9570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback