Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 86.5% (46th of 132)

Based on 422 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB

Very good average bench

The Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB averaged just 13.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 34.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 31.1GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB is 38.5%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.2ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 25GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 422 samples)
Min Avg Max
26.5 MC Read 34.7 43.9
19.7 MC Write 26.5 39.7
22.3 MC Mixed 31.1 36.6
87.9% 30.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.6 SC Read 25 31.5
18.8 SC Write 27.9 43.8
20.2 SC Mixed 30.2 37.3
79.1% 27.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
59.7 Latency 78.2 99.9
51.1% 78.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.7
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 35.4
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 29.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 29.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 23
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 19.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 9.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
422 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,289,064 RAM Kits tested

Typical BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB Builds (Compare 5,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $459

Popular BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback