Average Bench: 102% (23rd of 132)

Based on 1,738 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB averaged 1.5% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 42GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 35.6GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB is 47.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 72.6ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 25.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,738 samples)
Min Avg Max
30.8 MC Read 42 57.9
23.2 MC Write 32.9 45.3
25 MC Mixed 35.6 43.4
105% 36.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.5 SC Read 25.7 32.3
21.8 SC Write 31.7 48.6
22 SC Mixed 32.9 42.1
86% 30.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
53.2 Latency 72.6 92.6
55.1% 72.6 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 62.8
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 36.3
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 37.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 38.9
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 22.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 39.7
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 39
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 27.9
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 35
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 30.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 34.2
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 32.7
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
1,738 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,414,654 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMN32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB Builds (Compare 9,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $397

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,419

Popular CMN32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback