Average Bench: 233% (1st of 132)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE 16x31.9GB
Poor: 99%Average: 233% Great: 377%

Popular builds with this RAM

Outstanding average bench

The Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE 16x31.9GB averaged 133.1% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE 16x31.9GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 99.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 98.7GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE 16x31.9GB is 279%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE 16x31.9GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 12.6GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 110ns
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Min Avg Max
38.1 MC Read 98.7 190
37.7 MC Write 97.2 125
39 MC Mixed 99.3 159
281% 98.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.7 SC Read 12.6 22.4
6.9 SC Write 23.5 49.6
6.6 SC Mixed 19 41.8
52.5% 18.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
83.7 Latency 110 174
36.2% 110 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 190
MC Write 125
MC Mixed 159
452% 158 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 41.8
108% 37.9 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 112
MC Write 116
MC Mixed 132
342% 120 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
16 of 32 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 94.1
MC Write 124
MC Mixed 112
314% 110 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 13.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
16 of 32 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 92.4
MC Write 101
MC Mixed 87.3
268% 93.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 9.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
16 of 24 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
MC Read 65.7
MC Write 79.8
MC Mixed 66.6
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
16 of 32 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 39
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,415,551 RAM Kits tested

Typical M393A4K40EB3-CWE 16x31.9GB Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Dell Precision 7920 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular M393A4K40EB3-CWE 16x31.9GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback