TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Corsair

CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2021.

Average Bench: 92.1% (17th of 115)

Based on 17 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
Poor: 72%Average: 92.1% Great: 121%

Popular builds with this RAM

Excellent average bench

The Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB averaged just 7.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 37.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 32GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB is 48.9%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 82.1ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 22.4GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 17 samples)
Rank 1792.1%
Min Avg Max
23.5 MC Read 37.7 68
17 MC Write 31.2 43.4
23.7 MC Mixed 32 41.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16 SC Read 22.4 29.2
16.2 SC Write 29 43.7
22.4 SC Mixed 28.5 35
76.1% 26.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
61.2 Latency 82.1 114
48.7% 82.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
121% Outstanding
MC Read 67
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 33.8
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 33.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
117% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 41.3
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 30.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 37.4
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 28.8
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
97% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 34
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 29.3
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 38.7
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 29.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
78.7% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 31.4
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 27.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
65.8% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
17 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,355,399 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB Builds (Compare 23,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $78Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples5,054x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples3,214x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples2,986x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples1,523x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1,331x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1,321x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples899x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples792x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples692x
RAM
CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GBCorsairBench 92%, 17 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $565

Popular CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 2 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback