Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Crucial

CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2021.

Average Bench: 71.3% (95th of 132)

Based on 114 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GB
Poor: 45%Average: 71.3% Great: 82%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GB averaged 28.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 28GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 26.9GB/s

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GB is 36.8%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 101ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.5GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 114 samples)
Rank 9571.3%
Min Avg Max
16.3 MC Read 26 31.3
17.2 MC Write 28 31.8
16 MC Mixed 23.7 27.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.67 SC Read 14.5 22.1
12.9 SC Write 26.9 33.7
8.62 SC Mixed 20.2 26.3
58.7% 20.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
69.5 Latency 101 199
39.5% 101 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 24.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
73.7% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
71.9% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 17.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
71.7% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
60.9% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 17.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
114 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,225,103 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GB Builds (Compare 2,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ROG GL552VW GAMING LAPTOP - $1,049

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples2,113x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples417x
GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples1,665x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples865x
SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples329x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples227x
HFS256G39MND-2300A 256GBBench 64%, 2,675 samples67x
RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GBCrucialBench 71%, 114 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,049

Popular CT16G4SFD824A.M16FR 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback