Average Bench: 75.8% (70th of 115)

Based on 41 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB

Good average bench

The Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB averaged 24.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 31GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 29.1GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB is 54.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 123ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 13.7GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 41 samples)
Min Avg Max
9 MC Read 29.1 36.8
13.3 MC Write 31 41.1
10.5 MC Mixed 24.6 33
80.6% 28.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
3.9 SC Read 13.7 20.5
10.1 SC Write 27.6 40
5.5 SC Mixed 17.9 27.2
56.4% 19.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.8 Latency 123 417
32.6% 123 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 14.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 20
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
41 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,148,586 RAM Kits tested

Typical - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB Builds (Compare 589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Power G7 Mobile Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback