Average Bench: 152% (1st of 115)

Based on 2,353 user benchmarks.  Model: Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB averaged 52.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 62.1GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 58GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB is 50.7%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 87.5ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 25GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,353 samples)
Min Avg Max
47.2 MC Read 62.1 70.8
43.4 MC Write 58 67.1
42.6 MC Mixed 55.9 63.2
168% 58.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
17.4 SC Read 25 52.8
34.6 SC Write 48.8 58.7
23.5 SC Mixed 32 53.7
101% 35.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
74 Latency 87.5 102
45.7% 87.5 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 71.4
MC Write 67.6
MC Mixed 64.2
194% 67.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 53.7
SC Mixed 28.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 70.9
MC Write 66.6
MC Mixed 63.7
192% 67.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 51.8
SC Mixed 26.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 68.7
MC Write 65.4
MC Mixed 60.7
186% 64.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 30.7
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 68.3
MC Write 65.4
MC Mixed 60.9
185% 64.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 28.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 67.1
MC Write 62.8
MC Mixed 59.8
181% 63.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 28.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 66
MC Write 62.7
MC Mixed 59.7
179% 62.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 29.2
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 64.5
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 58.3
170% 59.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 28.3
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 61.6
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 55.8
165% 57.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 29.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 55.6
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 53.5
157% 54.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 25
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
2,353 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,049,958 RAM Kits tested

Typical CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB Builds (Compare 5,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,092

Popular CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback