Average Bench: 64.9% (87th of 115)

Based on 423 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 2x8GB

Above average average bench

The Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 2x8GB averaged 35.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 28GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 24.5GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 2x8GB is 43.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 106ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.5GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 423 samples)
Min Avg Max
11.9 MC Read 24.5 33.6
14.8 MC Write 23.6 31.1
12.2 MC Mixed 20.9 27.9
65.7% 23 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.1 SC Read 15.5 26
10.5 SC Write 28 41.7
8.16 SC Mixed 19.1 29.5
59.7% 20.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
64.2 Latency 106 188
37.7% 106 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 20
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 16.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 25.7
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 29.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 20.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 16.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 26.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 16.7
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
423 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,057,139 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 2x8GB Builds (Compare 3,989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FF 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback