Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR RAM
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Unknown

CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB

▲ 500 ▼

Release date ≈ Q4 2016.

Average Bench: 70.7% (97th of 132)

Based on 25 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB
Poor: 70%Average: 70.7% Great: 72%

Popular builds with this RAM

Good average bench

The Unknown CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB averaged 29.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 27.9GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.1GB/s

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB is just 2.35%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Unknown CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 14.7GB/s
Avg. Physical RAM Latency 80.7ns

Average Bench

(Based on 25 samples)
Rank 9770.7%
Min Avg Max
23.5 MC Read 25.9 26.9
26.3 MC Write 27.1 28
21.6 MC Mixed 22.6 25.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
13.2 SC Read 14.7 16.7
24.4 SC Write 27.9 28.7
18.7 SC Mixed 21.7 24.3
61.2% 21.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
73.6 Latency 80.7 114
49.5% 80.7 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
72% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
71.8% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
71% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
70.1% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
69.7% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
67.7% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
25 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,312,650 RAM Kits tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20EN001SUS

CPU
Xeon E3-1505M v5IntelBench 66%, 6,024 samples53x
GPU
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples29x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples23x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $397Bench 128%, 442,467 samples1x
SSD
SD8TN8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,739 samples5x
MZNLN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,407 samples5x
TM8FP8002T 2TBT-forceBench 205%, 870 samples3x
RAM
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GBUnknownBench 71%, 25 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
vs HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB
vs Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
vs G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
USB 3.0 vs 2.0 speed difference?
Why buy USB 3.0 today?
USB 3.0 / 4.0 release dates and max speeds?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
Memory Kits
What is the RAM value for money rating?
What is the effective RAM speed index?
What is the system memory latency ladder?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback