Average Bench: 47.1% (101st of 115)

Based on 25 user benchmarks.  Model: Kingston 9905744-101.A00G 1x31GB

Below average average bench

The Kingston 9905744-101.A00G 1x31GB averaged 52.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 18GB/s
Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 17.9GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston 9905744-101.A00G 1x31GB is 24.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingston 9905744-101.A00G 1x31GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 121ns
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 14.1GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 25 samples)
Min Avg Max
11.4 MC Read 16.9 20.5
10.9 MC Write 18 21.6
9.6 MC Mixed 14.1 18
46.6% 16.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
5.8 SC Read 14.8 21.8
8.6 SC Write 17.9 23.1
6.7 SC Mixed 15.1 21.5
45.5% 15.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
77.4 Latency 121 343
33.1% 121 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 22
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 343
12% 343 ns
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
25 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,362,698 RAM Kits tested

Typical 9905744-101.A00G 1x31GB Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular 9905744-101.A00G 1x31GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback