Average Bench: 105% (5th of 115)

Based on 222 user benchmarks.  Model: QEMU 4x16GB
Poor: 38%Average: 105% Great: 223%

Outstanding average bench

The QEMU 4x16GB averaged 5.2% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the QEMU 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 47GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 43.2GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the QEMU 4x16GB is 184%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the QEMU 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 137ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 11GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 222 samples)
Min Avg Max
15.5 MC Read 47 95.9
10.3 MC Write 39 88.9
12.8 MC Mixed 43.2 108
123% 43.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
3.6 SC Read 11 26.7
2.5 SC Write 12.6 26.7
3.01 SC Mixed 13.7 34.1
35.6% 12.5 GB/s
Min Avg Max
82.3 Latency 137 213
29.2% 137 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 940
MC Write 142
MC Mixed 267
1,285% 450 GB/s
SC Read 44.5
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 34.7
122% 42.7 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 209
MC Write 55.6
MC Mixed 91.2
338% 118 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 99.8
MC Write 117
MC Mixed 105
306% 107 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 30.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 68.9
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 47.9
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 151
27% 151 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 59.6
MC Mixed 37.7
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 8.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 26.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 18.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 270
15% 270 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 20
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 14.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
222 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,152,749 RAM Kits tested

Typical 4x16GB Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485

Popular 4x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback