Average Bench: 156% (1st of 115)

Based on 224 user benchmarks.  Model: G Skill Intl F5-5200J4040A16G 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The G Skill Intl F5-5200J4040A162x16GB averaged 56.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the G Skill Intl F5-5200J4040A162x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 63.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 61GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the G Skill Intl F5-5200J4040A162x16GB is 41.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the G Skill Intl F5-5200J4040A162x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 86ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.8GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 224 samples)
Min Avg Max
48.2 MC Read 63.5 71.9
48.5 MC Write 61 67.8
44.5 MC Mixed 57.3 63.5
173% 60.6 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.9 SC Read 21.8 47.8
38.8 SC Write 48.6 55.4
24.5 SC Mixed 29.8 49.6
95.5% 33.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
74.6 Latency 86 102
46.5% 86 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 70.1
MC Write 65.8
MC Mixed 63
189% 66.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 28.4
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 68.8
MC Write 65.1
MC Mixed 60.9
186% 64.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 29.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 67.5
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 61
182% 63.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 28.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 65.5
MC Write 62.5
MC Mixed 59.4
178% 62.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 54.8
SC Mixed 30
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 66.2
MC Write 65.4
MC Mixed 59.5
182% 63.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
MC Read 66.2
MC Write 60
MC Mixed 59.3
177% 61.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 28.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 63.4
MC Write 59.8
MC Mixed 57.3
172% 60.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 27.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 61.8
MC Write 58.7
MC Mixed 56
168% 58.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 48.8
SC Mixed 29.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 60.8
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 54.6
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 50.1
SC Mixed 28.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
224 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,196,851 RAM Kits tested

Typical Skill Intl F5-5200J4040A162x16GB Builds (Compare 3,111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,245

Popular Skill Intl F5-5200J4040A162x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback