Average Bench: 168% (1st of 115)

Based on 199 user benchmarks.  Model: Team Group Inc UD5-5600 4x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Team Group Inc UD5-5600 4x16GB averaged 67.9% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Team Group Inc UD5-5600 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 67.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 65.8GB/s

Poor consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Team Group Inc UD5-5600 4x16GB is 62.5%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Team Group Inc UD5-5600 4x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 82ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 23.9GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 199 samples)
Min Avg Max
48.8 MC Read 67.6 78.3
50.1 MC Write 65.8 75.7
47.9 MC Mixed 62.7 72.6
187% 65.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
16.8 SC Read 23.9 51.6
41.1 SC Write 49.4 57.9
26.5 SC Mixed 33.8 53.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
Min Avg Max
66.5 Latency 82 105
48.8% 82 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 80
MC Write 62.1
MC Mixed 69.7
202% 70.6 GB/s
SC Read 68.2
SC Write 64.1
SC Mixed 61.7
185% 64.7 GB/s
Latency 49.7
80% 49.7 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 76
MC Write 74.1
MC Mixed 71.1
211% 73.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 54.8
SC Mixed 34.1
106% 37.1 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 78
MC Write 72.5
MC Mixed 69
209% 73.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 54.1
SC Mixed 33.4
106% 37.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
MC Read 54.5
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 52.8
155% 54.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 25.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
MC Read 48.4
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 52.4
144% 50.5 GB/s
SC Read 39.2
SC Write 54.3
SC Mixed 43.2
130% 45.6 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 47.8
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 41.2
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 42.3
124% 43.4 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
199 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,358,358 RAM Kits tested

Typical Group Inc UD5-5600 4x16GB Builds (Compare 5,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z690 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D30)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,035

Popular Group Inc UD5-5600 4x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback