Average Bench: 71.6% (94th of 132)

Based on 20 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB

Good average bench

The Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB averaged 28.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.


Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 28.2GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 27.9GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB is 45.2%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. Physical RAM Latency 133ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 15.4GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 20 samples)
Min Avg Max
7.1 MC Read 26.5 35
5.6 MC Write 27.9 34.8
6.4 MC Mixed 23.1 28.3
73.8% 25.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
1.5 SC Read 15.4 23.2
4 SC Write 28.2 39.2
3.8 SC Mixed 20.5 28.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
61.3 Latency 133 749
30% 133 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 28.3
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 31
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 24.8
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 25.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 17.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 9.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
20 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,538,977 RAM Kits tested

Typical - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 76%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $189

Popular - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FN 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback