Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 87% (46th of 132)

Based on 1,373 user benchmarks.  Model: Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB

Very good average bench

The Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB averaged just 12.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 33.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 33.5GB/s

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB is 45%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 102ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 17GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 1,373 samples)
Min Avg Max
20.3 MC Read 33 40.1
21.8 MC Write 33.5 40.3
20.1 MC Mixed 29.7 37
91.7% 32.1 GB/s
Min Avg Max
8.53 SC Read 17 26.4
17.7 SC Write 33.7 43.8
11.2 SC Mixed 21.9 31
69.1% 24.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
67.6 Latency 102 152
39.1% 102 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 34.2
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 19.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 39
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 31.4
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 32.1
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 19.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 31.7
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 17.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
1,373 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,972,989 RAM Kits tested

Typical CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 4,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 15 9510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback