Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 98% (25th of 132)

Based on 11 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown W642GU44J2320NN 4x16GB
Poor: 89%Average: 98% Great: 111%

Excellent average bench

The Unknown W642GU44J2320NN 4x16GB averaged just 2.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown W642GU44J2320NN 4x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 1 Core Write Bench 43.3GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 37.7GB/s

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown W642GU44J2320NN 4x16GB is 22%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Unknown W642GU44J2320NN 4x16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 78.2ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.4GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 11 samples)
Min Avg Max
23.8 MC Read 36.3 41.7
20.4 MC Write 37.7 41.9
22.5 MC Mixed 31.5 36.8
101% 35.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
15.4 SC Read 21.4 28
22.7 SC Write 43.3 51.2
18.3 SC Mixed 28.1 33.4
88.4% 30.9 GB/s
Min Avg Max
57.4 Latency 78.2 115
51.2% 78.2 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 36.8
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 33.4
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 41.7
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 36.4
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 31.2
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 36.6
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 51
SC Mixed 32
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 36.7
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 32.1
104% 36.3 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 27.6
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 25.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
11 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,089,507 RAM Kits tested

Typical W642GU44J2320NN 4x16GB Builds (Compare 5,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $992

Popular W642GU44J2320NN 4x16GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback