Average Bench: 92.2% (16th of 115)

Based on 6 user benchmarks.  Model: King Tiger TMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB
Poor: 57%Average: 92.2% Great: 110%

Excellent average bench

The King Tiger TMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB averaged just 7.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the King Tiger TMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 35.5GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 34.9GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the King Tiger TMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB is 53.3%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the King Tiger TMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 101ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 19GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6 samples)
Min Avg Max
15.2 MC Read 34.9 42.6
29.7 MC Write 35.5 41.1
19.7 MC Mixed 31.7 37
97.2% 34 GB/s
Min Avg Max
6.4 SC Read 19 24.8
23.4 SC Write 33.7 42.5
9.4 SC Mixed 23.5 30.9
72.6% 25.4 GB/s
Min Avg Max
70.5 Latency 101 215
39.7% 101 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 36.7
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 37
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 29.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 36.4
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 29.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 32.9
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.3
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 19.7
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 9.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,360,926 RAM Kits tested

Typical Tiger TMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Thunderobot B660M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $376

Popular Tiger TMKU8G68AHFHD-32A 2x8GB systems:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

115 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback