Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 200% (1st of 132)

Based on 6,854 user benchmarks.  Model: Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB

Outstanding average bench

The Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB averaged 100.5% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 90.6GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Mixed IO Bench 68.5GB/s

Terrible consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB is 132%. This is a particularly wide range which indicates that the Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 67.1ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 55GB/s

Average Bench

(Based on 6,854 samples)
Min Avg Max
55 MC Read 90.6 192
52.4 MC Write 63.6 72.6
53.5 MC Mixed 68.5 83
212% 74.2 GB/s
Min Avg Max
41 SC Read 55 68.6
55 SC Write 67.3 75.4
47.4 SC Mixed 57.1 66.5
171% 59.8 GB/s
Min Avg Max
44.7 Latency 67.1 90
59.7% 67.1 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 203
MC Write 70
MC Mixed 99.3
354% 124 GB/s
SC Read 68
SC Write 82.2
SC Mixed 69.4
209% 73.2 GB/s
Latency 47.2
85% 47.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
MC Read 163
MC Write 68.8
MC Mixed 88.1
305% 107 GB/s
SC Read 63.5
SC Write 80.2
SC Mixed 68
202% 70.6 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 168
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 77.1
285% 99.9 GB/s
SC Read 65
SC Write 67.7
SC Mixed 56.6
180% 63.1 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 88.5
MC Write 77.7
MC Mixed 90.7
245% 85.6 GB/s
SC Read 64.1
SC Write 74.6
SC Mixed 73.9
202% 70.9 GB/s
Latency 44.5
90% 44.5 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
MC Read 87.2
MC Write 78.3
MC Mixed 89.9
243% 85.1 GB/s
SC Read 66.9
SC Write 73.9
SC Mixed 72.8
203% 71.2 GB/s
Latency 47.9
84% 47.9 ns
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 69.2
MC Write 54.7
MC Mixed 55.4
171% 59.8 GB/s
SC Read 54.5
SC Write 58.4
SC Mixed 51.2
156% 54.7 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
6,854 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,335,512 RAM Kits tested

Typical F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 296%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,579

Popular F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback