Average Bench: 176% (8th of 132)

Based on 42 user benchmarks.  Model: Essencore Limited KD5AGUA80-62E400S 2x16GB

Outstanding average bench

The Essencore Limited KD5AGUA80-62E400S 2x16GB averaged 75.8% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Essencore Limited KD5AGUA80-62E400S 2x16GB near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 16 Core Read Bench 72.7GB/s
Avg. 16 Core Write Bench 69.4GB/s

Below average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Essencore Limited KD5AGUA80-62E400S 2x16GB is 55.5%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Essencore Limited KD5AGUA80-62E400S 2x16GB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Physical RAM Latency 79.5ns
Avg. 1 Core Read Bench 21.1GB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 42 samples)
Min Avg Max
42.3 MC Read 72.7 86.2
54.7 MC Write 69.4 77.8
48.7 MC Mixed 65.9 75.9
198% 69.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
9.1 SC Read 21.1 24.9
22.7 SC Write 48.8 55.9
13.6 SC Mixed 30.1 34.6
95.2% 33.3 GB/s
Min Avg Max
60.8 Latency 79.5 118
50.3% 79.5 ns
User Benchmarks BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
The fastest RAM (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6200 MHz
MC Read 85.6
MC Write 77.7
MC Mixed 75.5
227% 79.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 53.3
SC Mixed 31.3
104% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6200 MHz
MC Read 82.2
MC Write 75.7
MC Mixed 74.1
221% 77.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 53.7
SC Mixed 34.9
107% 37.5 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 66
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 59.8
180% 63 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 52.9
SC Mixed 26.4
92% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 66
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 59.4
179% 62.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 54
SC Mixed 26.8
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 56.4
172% 60.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 48
SC Mixed 26.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
MC Read 24
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 34.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 24.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
42 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,404,424 RAM Kits tested

Typical Limited KD5AGUA80-62E400S 2x16GB Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z790-S01 (MS-7D88)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $805

Popular Limited KD5AGUA80-62E400S 2x16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your RAM? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Memory Kit Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 RAM Rankings

We calculate effective RAM speed which measures performance for typical desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current cost per GB to yield value for money. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top Memory Kits. [RAMPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

132 Memory Kits (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different RAM Kits perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback